Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 14.9K All Categories
- 6.4K General Discussions
- 267 New Legacy
- 29 New Legacy Bugs
- 236 PvP / VvV
- 162 Roleplay
- 439 Skills and Stats
- 227 Homes & Castles
- 613 Trade Forums
- 394 General Trade
- 219 Rares
- 4.3K Shard Forums
- 340 Atlantic
- 223 Arirang
- 5 Asuka
- 286 Baja
- 67 Balhae
- 593 Catskills
- 257 Chesapeake
- 136 Drachenfels
- 152 Europa
- 39 Formosa
- 199 Great Lakes
- 7 Hokuto
- 3 Izumo
- 120 Lake Austin
- 466 Lake Superior
- 102 Legends
- 5 Mizuho
- 5 Mugen
- 109 Napa Valley
- 102 Oceania
- 346 Origin
- 175 Pacific
- 5 Sakura
- 298 Siege
- 286 Sonoma
- 5 Wakoku
- 13 Yamato
- 14 ClassicUO Web Client
- 2.3K Customer Service
- 1.6K Bugs
- 136 Dev Feed
- 177 Forum Feedback
- 338 Test Center
Comments
I see you all here complaining non-stop.
I see myself, and everyone else just playing the game, and doing really well.
There is a disconnect.
At some point, you guys have to realise it is you.
I built a 5 day old warrior, and once he got 35 drops for the conjurers trinket, and a whirlwind weapon he was away. If you are finding it hard, I have absolutely no idea why?
I was always against shard bound - I put forward many logical arguments, and got beaten down by a load of players who don't have a clue, much like yourself.
I've given up trying on that argument, at some point, I've said my bit, there is no point carrying on.
That is how I feel about you, and a lot of your points.
To give the Devs some credit, they did take on board the fact that shard bound gave a massive block on event items and stuff, and have massively increased the potential to acquire them, so shards cannot run out. So whilst they did not lift shard-bound, or do what I would have liked them to do, they eased the pressure up a lot.
The 2nd bit - I think the event is too easy already. It does not need to be made easier. But sure, if it helps, if the Devs think it is a good idea.
I have said the solution is in your hands.
Those players have made their own problems.
They were all fine to move that way, over-crowded the server, having lots of issues.
It does not take much to see the players themselves could spread back out, balance the servers out, and increase their playability.
They created their problems, they can fix it.
I said I was here, because the thread initially assumed all shards, I have no issues with what they do on Atlantic. I've even said I play there, and can sympathise a bit. But the thread is incorrect, for the majority of the playerbase, on the 24 other shards. Atlantic is a drop in the ocean, it is not all about you guys.
But then I have also said.
I remember, when there was a mass player migration to Atlantic.
It is not a case of everyone started there 25 years ago, players mass migrated off other servers to be on Atlantic. I remember when half of Europa's pvpers went to Atlantic. I remember when Europa merchants went to Atlantic. Many players are playing on Atlantic with worse ping. They've made a choice, clearly a bad one.
They went there, quoting "it is better". It is in fact worse in some aspects.
Those players, created their own problems, they can fix it.
Show me your intelligence, list all the US based shards that exist.
And honestly, you do not talk like a vet. Vets bring solutions, not problems.
There is one obviously over-crowded server that is lagged out, and no amount of help can probably help it.
There are 24 servers that are working fine.
It does not take a genius to see the solution?
Especially for all those players that migrated from another server, to put themselves in that mess.
I argued against shard bound items for a long time.
I believe they harmed trade, and harmed pvpers, and veterans who liked to move between servers.
People need to understand, Atlantic is good for trading, that is it.
It is not good to play on, because all the content is maxed out, you cannot actually do anything.
And here you are, complaining about maxed out content, as always, the same as all the rest, who made their decisions.
I feel sorry for you, if you are a genuine Atlantic vet from 25 years ago, but again, you have a choice.
Hint - like we always said to Popps, if you stay off the forums, and actually play, you will find the game much easier
And your dad isn't going to be happy when he finds out you've been on half his accounts, and got 3 of them banned off the forums.
And who says that? The worlds expert on your mom jokes, you? The only thing you ever did with your mom jokes was thinking we were joking... When in fact we were not.
You are a 25 year Atlantic vet.
You have 20+ accounts.
You are happy to spend $2-3k on cosmetic items per month.
You own a business, and can get your employee's to code bots for you, or you could set up bots in 2 days yourself.
You are my dad?!
Am I missing anything ?
Good morning, I hope you are well !!
Sounds like you should delete the fel spawn and move it elsewhere. Might I suggest... WINTER SPUR?
I will be slow to reply because I cannot log in/stay logged in to the forums.
Make this your signature if you are tired of Vendor Search being broken, over FIVE YEARS and counting.
Vendor search rendered useless after Publish 106 – Forsaken Foes on August 14, 2019.
Makes you wonder why he wants winterspur open.
Kyronix says the Fel city only has 5% of the population at a given time.
You would think his train that his employees programed for him could play in Fel.
95% of the players pay to keep the servers running while ~50% of the events cater to 5% of the population.
I was wondering about the shard bound items, but if it keeps people like PsycoderFor from bringing their toxicity to other shards just to farm items, I'm all for shard bound. Keep people like them on Atlantic.
So, why is the Fel ruleset even being supported for less than 5% of the population?