Why the Huntmaster's Gatherer’s Pack does not help with gems ?


I am forced to leave behind, from the Hidden Chests at the current Event, the gems which can often be found in the chests, because of their weight which adds up.

Yet, I could take them for imbuing if there was a way to reduce their weight while in my main backpack.

I thought about using the Gatherer’s Pack from the Huntmaster but, to my surprise, gems are not listed among the items which benefit from a weight reduction...

Wold it be possible to include them ? After all, they can also, if one wanted, be picked as a resource...

«1

Comments

  • JackFlashUkJackFlashUk Posts: 1,123
    edited October 26
    popps said:



    Wold it be possible to include them ? After all, they can also, if one wanted, be picked as a resource...

    Why have you gone around the world 5 times to ask something here?

    what DO YOU ACTUALLY want??
  • PawainPawain Posts: 11,493
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • poppspopps Posts: 4,312
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

  • popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.
    A Goblin, a Gargoyle, and a Drow walk into a bar . . .

    Never be afraid to challenge the status quo

  • vortexvortex Posts: 273
    Good Lord man... Please change your avatar pic to this. 
  • poppspopps Posts: 4,312
    popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.

    Some could argue that saving up those cheap, little gems needed for imbuing could actually be playing the game... if only, they would be less heavy like fitting in a Huntmaster satchel...
  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    popps said:
    popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.

    Some could argue that saving up those cheap, little gems needed for imbuing could actually be playing the game... if only, they would be less heavy like fitting in a Huntmaster satchel...
    Bring a beetle 
  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 1,352
    @popps you should accept Vortex proposition for the meme.

    Be a good player ;)
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?

    Leave attended paying accounts alone, these people go thru a lot of trouble to automate the game.

    It’s comical to me you are so frightened of somehow bod scripters get some sort of advantage.

    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • poppspopps Posts: 4,312
    edited October 27
    Grimbeard said:
    popps said:
    popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.

    Some could argue that saving up those cheap, little gems needed for imbuing could actually be playing the game... if only, they would be less heavy like fitting in a Huntmaster satchel...
    Bring a beetle 
    Is there a joke ? For a in-game activity that demands hiding and stealthing ?

    Bring a pack Beetle ? I am speechless...
  • popps said:
    popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.

    Some could argue that saving up those cheap, little gems needed for imbuing could actually be playing the game... if only, they would be less heavy like fitting in a Huntmaster satchel...
    If you want them, take them and use a BoS. The charges are free to those who bother to run the solen matriach quest once a month. it doesn't take long and the 100 will last you a very long time. 
    A Goblin, a Gargoyle, and a Drow walk into a bar . . .

    Never be afraid to challenge the status quo

  • Petra_FydePetra_Fyde Posts: 1,539
    Suggestion:
    1. Clear out of your backpack anything you don't actually need to have with you
    2. Decide which of the gems you actually need and collect only those
    3. Don't pick up items you'll never use
    4. Carry a bag of sending, if you don't want to send the gems to the bank, send the heaviest of the 'of the umbrascale' items you've found.
    5. if you're in danger of becoming overweight, recall out, unload and then return.
  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    popps said:
    Grimbeard said:
    popps said:
    popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.

    Some could argue that saving up those cheap, little gems needed for imbuing could actually be playing the game... if only, they would be less heavy like fitting in a Huntmaster satchel...
    Bring a beetle 
    Is there a joke ? For a in-game activity that demands hiding and stealthing ?

    Bring a pack Beetle ? I am speechless...
    Any template with detect hidden can find chest including a tamer??
  • PawainPawain Posts: 11,493
    The BoS I mentioned was to send the single junk items or gold that are weighing you down.
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • JackFlashUkJackFlashUk Posts: 1,123
     ? I am speechless...
    if only
  • Grimbeard said:
    popps said:
    Grimbeard said:
    popps said:
    popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.

    Some could argue that saving up those cheap, little gems needed for imbuing could actually be playing the game... if only, they would be less heavy like fitting in a Huntmaster satchel...
    Bring a beetle 
    Is there a joke ? For a in-game activity that demands hiding and stealthing ?

    Bring a pack Beetle ? I am speechless...
    Any template with detect hidden can find chest including a tamer??

    Quit making sense. 
    A Goblin, a Gargoyle, and a Drow walk into a bar . . .

    Never be afraid to challenge the status quo

  • PawainPawain Posts: 11,493
    edited October 27
    But he needs LUCK so he can do 1/3 the amount of chests he could without it, in the same amount of time.
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • vortexvortex Posts: 273
    edited October 27
     ? I am speechless...
    if only


  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    popps said:
    Grimbeard said:
    popps said:
    popps said:
    Pawain said:
    They weigh 1 per 10!  Your guy has too much junk on him.  Bag of Sending.
    Have you see how much the charges cost to send cheap gems to the bank ?

    As in regards to their weight, check the "total" weight of a satchel with gems in 1 single hidden chest, then multiply by the number of chests one can do in like an hour and see what the total weight for all gems gathered would be...

    A Huntman's bag reducing their weight would be much, much needed, me thinks...

    If they're cheap, then you don't really need them. And the charges cost me zero, zip, zilch, nada. go play the game instead of Trolling the forums.

    Some could argue that saving up those cheap, little gems needed for imbuing could actually be playing the game... if only, they would be less heavy like fitting in a Huntmaster satchel...
    Bring a beetle 
    Is there a joke ? For a in-game activity that demands hiding and stealthing ?

    Bring a pack Beetle ? I am speechless...


  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 1,352
    edited October 27
    Grimbeard said:


    the f...  :D

    I give up on Mcdougle.


    vortex said:


    The impossible is... wich make it possible?!
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?

    Leave attended paying accounts alone, these people go thru a lot of trouble to automate the game.

    It’s comical to me you are so frightened of somehow bod scripters get some sort of advantage.

    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    KroDuK said:
    Grimbeard said:


    the f...  :D

    I give up on Mcdougle.


    vortex said:


    The impossible is... wich make it possible?!
    Your non playing opinion is worthless 
  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 1,352
    edited October 28
    Grimbeard said:
    Your non playing opinion is worthless 
    For now.. I'll quote this in the future.


    No stealing  :D
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?

    Leave attended paying accounts alone, these people go thru a lot of trouble to automate the game.

    It’s comical to me you are so frightened of somehow bod scripters get some sort of advantage.

    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    KroDuK said:
    Grimbeard said:
    Your non playing opinion is worthless 
    For now.. I'll quote this in the future.


    No stealing  :D
    He wasn't stealing gems was he
  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 1,352
    oh wait.. you were serious?

    My bad Grimbeard, I want to officially apologize, I'll consider everything u say and try to help you as well.
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?

    Leave attended paying accounts alone, these people go thru a lot of trouble to automate the game.

    It’s comical to me you are so frightened of somehow bod scripters get some sort of advantage.

    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    I will follow any instructions your character on baja gives me 
  • PawainPawain Posts: 11,493
     :D   
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 1,352
    edited October 28
    Pawain said:
     :D   
    Not nice to laugh at this.

    The desperation is real.
    @Mcdougle Work with me and you won't need to act like this to have new friends on Baja.


    Also, @paiwan did u forget to quote his build "tip" to Popps thief problemsss?:

                                                                        *insert two clowns emote*
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?

    Leave attended paying accounts alone, these people go thru a lot of trouble to automate the game.

    It’s comical to me you are so frightened of somehow bod scripters get some sort of advantage.

    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    KroDuK said:
    Pawain said:
     :D   
    Not nice to laugh at this.

    The desperation is real.
    @ Mcdougle Work with me and you won't need to act like this to have new friends on Baja.


    Also, @ paiwan did u forget to quote his build "tip" to Popps thief problemsss?:

                                                                        *insert two clowns emote*
    The biggest joke is you pay to not play so you can trash talk here..
  • PawainPawain Posts: 11,493
     :D 
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 1,352
    edited October 28
    Once again.. just think about it before hitting the send button.

    What is worse, paying to not play only cuz you don't want to lose your pixels?
    Or, paying to have access to the forum trying to make UO, wich is not the shadow of itself, a better game?

    *Insert dot dot dot*


    Edit: Do me a solid, will you? Change those profiles pics for Harry & Lloyd.. the only rule: first come, first serve.
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?

    Leave attended paying accounts alone, these people go thru a lot of trouble to automate the game.

    It’s comical to me you are so frightened of somehow bod scripters get some sort of advantage.

    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 3,267
    Do you think even the slightest bit of the crap you babble about is going to change anything?  I mean really?  
Sign In or Register to comment.