client binaries appear to be missing security mitigations

ForeverFunForeverFun Posts: 795
edited January 31 in Bugs
At least for EC (UOSA.EXE), and possibly CC as well.

Missing security mitigations such as DYNAMICBASE.

Should probably also set LARGEADDRESSAWARE, at least until native x64 binary[s'] are built?

Expected result: binaries should have all current security mitigations enabled.

p.s. is broadsword OK with instructions being posted on how to remedy some aspects of this?

Comments

  • MariahMariah Posts: 2,972Moderator
    I think it would be safer to convey that information in an email - uo@broadsword.com should be the appropriate address.
  • ForeverFunForeverFun Posts: 795
    Mariah said:
    I think it would be safer to convey that information in an email - uo@ broadsword.com should be the appropriate address.

    I've never received any reply for bug reports sent to that email address (nor fixes in publishes).  Problem with my email, or on the broadsword side?

    I can be reached here via direct/private message.
Sign In or Register to comment.