Bilbo
About
- Username
- Bilbo
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,689
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
- Posts
- 2,834
- Primary Shard
- Cat
Comments
-
How about 1 hour
-
What harm would there be in letting these things run other than making more of the items available so their prices come down and god forbid it gives us more thing to do in UO at the same time.
-
There are plenty of 14+ year vets that do xfers for free so why would you think something would even sell.
-
Smoot said: if EM items were shard bound, it would only be realistic to have EMs and EM events on about 10 servers. the other shards local populations just dont warrant having an EM with the very low numbers that would show up if items cou…
-
%1000 AGREE
-
Outstanding idea. I just mark a rune and place it above the teleport tile
-
IBTL
-
%1000 agree, OPEN FEL ON ALL SHARDS, ASAP @Kyronix
-
@RockStaR I agree that all EM Items should be shard bound but if they are not then the item should have the name of the shard on them so when we see them we will know where they come from.
-
Pawain said: Marge said: Pawain said: Ive never heard the epaulets look ugly before. There are ugly robe slot items but not those. The epaulets are ugly. Shoulder pads on women's clothing was ugly in the 80's and they a…
-
You poor little girls, go back to your home shards and leave us alone. LMAO 3 little girls whining
-
huge criticism, what a joke. The only whiners are the ones that want to farm lower pop shards and then xfer to Atl and price gouge. The DEVs said they were shard bound and that is the way it is no matter how much of a baby you are. Go play your h…
-
Good that means the low pop shard farmers will stay on their own shard and leave us alone.
-
NP
-
or do BODs
-
what shard are you on
-
keven2002 said: Bilbo said: keven2002 said: Pawain said: If the 50/50 were true: Every once in a while PvP appears in Chat on LS. They have a lot of fun. But, I never see anyone that is PvMing leave and go get their PvP …
-
Tim said: The bottom line is. UO is a game and if to play it the player has to do too much they don't enjoy to get to the parts they do, they will quit and find a game they do enjoy. This applies to PvP, resource gathering or just grinding a…
-
keven2002 said: Pawain said: Marge said: What many people fail to realize is there is probably an actual 50/50 split between people that want (like) pvp and people that don't want (HATE) pvp. We are all focused on what we know, …
-
What about the Account Bound Items that were on Vendor before the fix? Did UO auto remove them or maybe make them nonsalable.
-
Wess said: Bilbo said: Wess said: I didn't vote. Add a "merge and fix server issues" as an option to vote and lets take a look We are talking about the new shard not all of UO. So am i, this is not going to be a tota…
-
Wess said: I didn't vote. Add a "merge and fix server issues" as an option to vote and lets take a look We are talking about the new shard not all of UO.
-
Tim said: Opt in polls such as here have no real world meaning. Was the 27 people who bothered to "vote" just one person with 27 accounts? Did the majority of potential voters even know the poll was being done? A much more interesting number …
-
A classic UO Pre-Tram with rampant killing will not bring in any new players to main UO, this will be a total waste of time and energy.
-
@Smoot do you think anybody is going to be stupid enough to buy a house when it will be wiped, you really need to use your brain. As far as non-con PvP with no insurance goes if you think it is so great then please do us all a favor and delete all …
-
bryweyh007 said: Bilbo said: You do understand that you can do more than 175M in the trade window You do understand that I will end up spamming general chat to sell items then? If that's fine with everyone then I spose I can start a…
-
Well said @Lady_Storm We already have a Non-Con Shard and they refuse to play it so why would we make another Non-Con shard just to appease a select few. If you want PvP then join VvV and kill all the other VvV people, stop asking for more SHEEP
-
What is the difference between your #4 and SP, isn't that what SP is right now (Non-Consensual with no insurance (exactly like it was pre-Trammel)). Why isn't SP that packed if you think that rule set is so great.