Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In

Categories

Ladies and Gentlemen, its time to drop Lost lands

psychopsycho Posts: 356
in General Discussions
Meanwhile the playerbase got bigger and bigger it was fun to add new landmass, however this is no longer the case. The past years less players has joined our community and its time for less landmass. I hearby suggest the removal of Lost lands trammel and felluca.

I do however understand the need for felucca Oaks spawn, in order to spawn a harrower, and I suggest this will be a part of the dungeon covetous or Wrong.

Its about time UO seak the ventures of player justice and the rules of feluca. All hail the felucian King!

Comments

  • BilboBilbo Posts: 2,834
    edited March 2018




    TYVM for the good belly laugh or were you serious.
  • MervynMervyn Posts: 2,208
    Would cut the scout time in half. 
    I tell you the truth, tis better to do 10 damage on the right target than 100 damage on the wrong target.

    Breaking in the young since 2002


  • Petra_FydePetra_Fyde Posts: 1,468
    Just to be sure I understand, you want to concentrate all the champspawns into the few dungeons so you don't have to look for lone blues trying to slip in a champ without being raided?

    Just for the record - I mine in lost lands, I fish in lost lands, I occasionally collect bods in lost lands, I hunt terathans and ophidians in lost lands and yes, occasionally if I think I can get away with it, I champ in lost lands.
  • MervynMervyn Posts: 2,208
    Why does it have to be reds looking for lone blues and not blues looking for reds?
    I tell you the truth, tis better to do 10 damage on the right target than 100 damage on the wrong target.

    Breaking in the young since 2002


  • AaylaAayla Posts: 170
    LOL
  • SmootSmoot Posts: 411
    I kinda agree, that at this point it would be nice to condense the landmass so people are more likely to run into other players.

    this probably would never happen, theres no point to taking away land that time was spent on to create.

    What i could see is something to be done with the land, a place for new content, invasions, or new pvm or pvp encounters.  housing as well, if only in a few select locations.




  • ThalonThalon Posts: 61
    I like the Lost Lands. City of the Dead, Titan Valley and northern desert were my favorite places to adventure before Ilshenar was created. Still visit often.
    Thalon, Merchant Sailor of Pacific for fine Tools, Clothing, and Potions!
    Blacksmithing, Carpentry and Inscription services offered through afilliated subcontractors.
    Exotic beasts available with proper authorization from the Crown.
  • SableSable Posts: 247
    I vote no on these ideas.
  • IvenorIvenor Posts: 1,216
    Sable said:
    I vote no on these ideas.
    Me too.
  • BilboBilbo Posts: 2,834
  • Lady_StormLady_Storm Posts: 400

    All the Sheep aside...  Answer is a huge NO.  

    I for one see many good uses there.. hunting and mining.. the wood on some tree stands is huge. Not to mention my tamers would be super peved at you if you had one blade of grass changed.

  • InLorInLor Posts: 414
    Hell no.
    A qua lemmúr wíste, an zen anku vol verde wís.
  • LunkLunk Posts: 5
    in that case i sugest all spanw go  but one so the lazy reds  do not have   to look to rade...  sigh  no  love lost lands
  • MariahMariah Posts: 3,302Moderator
    Please don't indulge in thread necromancy.
This discussion has been closed.