Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In

Categories

UO Team gating client features? 3

PoisonPoison Posts: 50
edited November 4 in General Discussions
Stop closing my discussions lol

It really sucks the UO Team are allowing developers to gate features behind additional products. Please update the real classic client to be comparable to other sanctioned clients and stop feeding us trash.
Tagged:

Comments

  • OreoglOreogl Posts: 431
    The mods have been pretty patient with you.  Frankly I’m surprised you haven’t earned some time off from here. 

    There are better ways to get your point across.  Stop with the shoddy polls and make your discussions more constructive.
  • PoisonPoison Posts: 50
    edited November 4
    Oreogl said:
    The mods have been pretty patient with you.  Frankly I’m surprised you haven’t earned some time off from here. 

    There are better ways to get your point across.  Stop with the shoddy polls and make your discussions more constructive.

    Your response definitely helps build a more constructive environment to help get my point across. Thank you for your concern but lets try to stay on topic please, if you have any further concerns with my formatting please reach out to me personally via the mailing system here on the forums.
  • OreoglOreogl Posts: 431
    Poison said:
    Oreogl said:
    The mods have been pretty patient with you.  Frankly I’m surprised you haven’t earned some time off from here. 

    There are better ways to get your point across.  Stop with the shoddy polls and make your discussions more constructive.

    Your response definitely helps build a more constructive environment to help get my point across. Thank you for your concern but let’s try to stay on topic please, if you have any further concerns with my formatting please reach out to me personally via the mailing system here on the forums.
    I don’t really think any more needs to be said here.  It’s likely a matter of time before this repeat of the other two threads is closed.  

    Let’s do better.
  • PoisonPoison Posts: 50
    Oreogl said:
    Poison said:
    Oreogl said:
    The mods have been pretty patient with you.  Frankly I’m surprised you haven’t earned some time off from here. 

    There are better ways to get your point across.  Stop with the shoddy polls and make your discussions more constructive.

    Your response definitely helps build a more constructive environment to help get my point across. Thank you for your concern but let’s try to stay on topic please, if you have any further concerns with my formatting please reach out to me personally via the mailing system here on the forums.
    I don’t really think any more needs to be said here.  It’s likely a matter of time before this repeat of the other two threads is closed.  

    Let’s do better.

    You can do better by messaging me via the mail system here on the forums if your not going to be constructive to the post. All your doing is trying to put me down and all I am doing is pointing out and asking for the UO Team to fix the large gaps of indifference in the approved clients and not gate features lol.

  • sibblesibble Posts: 188
    Poison said:

    ... all I am doing is pointing out and asking for the UO Team to fix the large gaps of indifference in the approved clients and not gate features ...



    It would help if you discussed which features you believe are gated instead of these satire blurbs that don't describe anything

    "everything looks stupid" UO feedback 2024
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 398
    Poison said:
    It really sucks the UO Team are allowing developers to gate features behind additional products. Please update the real classic client to be comparable to other sanctioned clients and stop feeding us trash.

    You keep referring to signing up for a free Discord account as "gating features behind additional products" like you think it's a really great turn of a phrase that will persuade people to your side. When do you think that's going to start happening? Because you've been repeating it for days now and literally no one gives a shit so far.
  • PoisonPoison Posts: 50
    Poison said:
    It really sucks the UO Team are allowing developers to gate features behind additional products. Please update the real classic client to be comparable to other sanctioned clients and stop feeding us trash.

    You keep referring to signing up for a free Discord account as "gating features behind additional products" like you think it's a really great turn of a phrase that will persuade people to your side. When do you think that's going to start happening? Because you've been repeating it for days now and literally no one gives a shit so far.
    Stop blocking my discussion and I will stop repeating my posts haha.
  • sibblesibble Posts: 188
    Using Discord as a SSO is not a "gated feature"
    "everything looks stupid" UO feedback 2024
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 398
    Poison said:

    Stop blocking my discussion and I will stop repeating my posts haha.

    No really, how many more threads do you think it'll take before anyone else agrees that "gating features behind additional products" is an actual problem? When's the movement taking off? lmao
  • PoisonPoison Posts: 50
    sibble said:
    Poison said:

    ... all I am doing is pointing out and asking for the UO Team to fix the large gaps of indifference in the approved clients and not gate features ...



    It would help if you discussed which features you believe are gated instead of these satire blurbs that don't describe anything


    All features on UO's approved clients should be actionable on any approved client. The UO Team should honestly stop everything and start building one client with optional graphics like every other game in the world.
  • PoisonPoison Posts: 50
    edited November 4
    Poison said:

    Stop blocking my discussion and I will stop repeating my posts haha.

    No really, how many more threads do you think it'll take before anyone else agrees that "gating features behind additional products" is an actual problem? When's the movement taking off? lmao

    More people are likely to react like you to things they do not like versus join up a cause. I do not expect anyone to voice their agreements with me but I feel some people do appreciate my words and you can fight me all day but it will change nothing from my point of view.
  • sibblesibble Posts: 188
    Poison said:

    All features on UO's approved clients should be actionable on any approved client. The UO Team should honestly stop everything and start building one client with optional graphics like every other game in the world.
    I don't disagree with you, standardization of what functionality is allowed/disallowed should be clear and right now it's a complete mess.

    I believe much of what's going on now is too many projects going for the small studio that runs the show.
    • New Legacy - bug squashing, ticket handling, etc.
    • Seasonal/Questing/Halloween stuff
    • Client coding/re-coding
    "everything looks stupid" UO feedback 2024
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 398
    edited November 4
    Poison said:

    More people are likely to react like you to things they do not like versus join up a cause. I do not expect anyone to voice their agreements with me but I feel some people do appreciate my words and you can fight me all day but it will change nothing from my point of view.

    What do you think the odds are that the Broadsword and/or CUO teams are going to shift their development priorities due to some some village idiot nobody agrees with, who "felt some people appreciated his words" while getting a bunch of threads locked?
  • PoisonPoison Posts: 50
    I do not care how the paid developers feel when they are at work, I feel bad for the free devs on cuo side that got baited into dropping the ccWeb variant when clearly nothing else was really ready lol.
This discussion has been closed.