Fall Dynamic Events Discussion

twizag

keven2002 said:

@ Ivenor - Why did you go to ATL to do Treasures of events then instead of your own shard that you wanted the pieces? I'm guessing it's because you wanted to sell all of your drops / rewards when you could (keeping a few pieces) and then Xfer the money back to your home shard? 

These treasures events (every one except maybe Deceit) have all been long enough where you can go make your money on ATL like you have been and then complete your suits on your home shard. I've done that for each event myself (except for Deceit). There have been a few times where I would trade a few pieces (while the event was going on) for the one I needed; even on low pop shards.

Let's stop acting like it's some big travesty that these items remain shard bound. If it's really such an issue having these items on your home shard then stop being greedy trying to make plats from ATL. You can't always have your cake and eat it too  

• You don't quite understand the essence of the question correctly. It's good to play on another shard when you have a good ping. And if you are on the other side of the ocean? It's not my problem that there are no players on some shards, it's a UO problem. So why am I deprived of the opportunity to earn money? If Atlantic is the largest market, then what is the problem? Or is it that some players here have specifically created a problem with shard bound things in order to earn not 1 platinum but 10 without competition? And then make more money by selling this gold? At the moment, the events are arranged in such a way that you can earn only with your hands and hours spent. Is it bad that the price in the Atlantic will be regulated as in all markets in the real economy? How do bans and duties differ from shard bound? This is not a solution to the problem. There are many other ways, this one is the easiest to solve but the most flawed. The developers did not answer me the reason for making such a decision, except for the general phrases - "We decided so."

keven2002

twizag said:

keven2002 said:

@ Ivenor - Why did you go to ATL to do Treasures of events then instead of your own shard that you wanted the pieces? I'm guessing it's because you wanted to sell all of your drops / rewards when you could (keeping a few pieces) and then Xfer the money back to your home shard? 

These treasures events (every one except maybe Deceit) have all been long enough where you can go make your money on ATL like you have been and then complete your suits on your home shard. I've done that for each event myself (except for Deceit). There have been a few times where I would trade a few pieces (while the event was going on) for the one I needed; even on low pop shards.

Let's stop acting like it's some big travesty that these items remain shard bound. If it's really such an issue having these items on your home shard then stop being greedy trying to make plats from ATL. You can't always have your cake and eat it too  

• You don't quite understand the essence of the question correctly. It's good to play on another shard when you have a good ping. And if you are on the other side of the ocean? It's not my problem that there are no players on some shards, it's a UO problem. So why am I deprived of the opportunity to earn money? If Atlantic is the largest market, then what is the problem? Or is it that some players here have specifically created a problem with shard bound things in order to earn not 1 platinum but 10 without competition? And then make more money by selling this gold? At the moment, the events are arranged in such a way that you can earn only with your hands and hours spent. Is it bad that the price in the Atlantic will be regulated as in all markets in the real economy? How do bans and duties differ from shard bound? This is not a solution to the problem. There are many other ways, this one is the easiest to solve but the most flawed. The developers did not answer me the reason for making such a decision, except for the general phrases - "We decided so."

I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say. You can earn money on whatever shard you want just by doing the event. ATL doesn't regulate price on other shards and if you actually took notice for the Deceit this time around you would have noticed that; ATL drops sold for around 1M per piece while all other shards were 2M per. 

CovenantX

McDougle said:

So you are okay with allowing spawn in tram 

   Yes, but not powerscrolls. 

Otherwise convenience would cause trammel to be far superior in terms of drops/hour.  particularly because you can recall in and out of the dungeon to turn-in your points...  which is greater than the 'luck bonus' that fel supposedly offers.

Grimbeard

CovenantX said:

McDougle said:

So you are okay with allowing spawn in tram 

   Yes, but not powerscrolls. 

Otherwise convenience would cause trammel to be far superior in terms of drops/hour.  particularly because you can recall in and out of the dungeon to turn-in your points...  which is greater than the 'luck bonus' that fel supposedly offers.

So drops in fel should be cursed right risk vs reward thing 

CovenantX

Grimbeard said:

CovenantX said:

McDougle said:

So you are okay with allowing spawn in tram 

   Yes, but not powerscrolls. 

Otherwise convenience would cause trammel to be far superior in terms of drops/hour.  particularly because you can recall in and out of the dungeon to turn-in your points...  which is greater than the 'luck bonus' that fel supposedly offers.

So drops in fel should be cursed right risk vs reward thing 

  already answered that, of course they should be cursed in fel.

twizag

keven2002 said:

twizag said:

keven2002 said:

@ Ivenor - Why did you go to ATL to do Treasures of events then instead of your own shard that you wanted the pieces? I'm guessing it's because you wanted to sell all of your drops / rewards when you could (keeping a few pieces) and then Xfer the money back to your home shard? 

These treasures events (every one except maybe Deceit) have all been long enough where you can go make your money on ATL like you have been and then complete your suits on your home shard. I've done that for each event myself (except for Deceit). There have been a few times where I would trade a few pieces (while the event was going on) for the one I needed; even on low pop shards.

Let's stop acting like it's some big travesty that these items remain shard bound. If it's really such an issue having these items on your home shard then stop being greedy trying to make plats from ATL. You can't always have your cake and eat it too  

• You don't quite understand the essence of the question correctly. It's good to play on another shard when you have a good ping. And if you are on the other side of the ocean? It's not my problem that there are no players on some shards, it's a UO problem. So why am I deprived of the opportunity to earn money? If Atlantic is the largest market, then what is the problem? Or is it that some players here have specifically created a problem with shard bound things in order to earn not 1 platinum but 10 without competition? And then make more money by selling this gold? At the moment, the events are arranged in such a way that you can earn only with your hands and hours spent. Is it bad that the price in the Atlantic will be regulated as in all markets in the real economy? How do bans and duties differ from shard bound? This is not a solution to the problem. There are many other ways, this one is the easiest to solve but the most flawed. The developers did not answer me the reason for making such a decision, except for the general phrases - "We decided so."

I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say. You can earn money on whatever shard you want just by doing the event. ATL doesn't regulate price on other shards and if you actually took notice for the Deceit this time around you would have noticed that; ATL drops sold for around 1M per piece while all other shards were 2M per. 

The problem is that at the moment it is unrealistic to sell anything on other fragments. Corny all stuffed themselves as much as they wanted. The market is limited